‘The Exorcist’ — A Study in Modern Western Mysticism

William Peter Blatty’s The Exorcist presents a fictionalized account of demonic possession, well researched and written. The novel and the movie are almost perfectly faithful to one another. The story grips, moves from scene to scene with intense dialog, short emotive passages, and spine-tingling supernatural terror. Introspection happens in the moment, in short perfect bursts, even when Blatty’s overuse of semicolons and sentence fragments gets tiresome. But beyond the technical issues, at the heart of the story, lurks something deeper–a mythic pattern told with eloquence and awful beauty conveying the theme of Redemption via Sacrifice.

Lurking beneath the scene-driven novel (a feature which makes for a near isomorphism to the Silver Screen) rests a very obvious mythic subtext. From the outset, as Father Merrin concludes his archeological excavation in Iraq, the reader is drawn into the mythic space of the novel. As Merrin confronts the statue of Pazuzu in the desert, the reader stands at the intersection of antiquity and the post-modern age, between the vast unknowns of history at the dawn of civilization and the skeptical age.

Enter Damien Karras, Society of Jesus. Karras, a trained psychiatrist and priest, faces the consequence of reason, the burden of the tediousness of the Eucharist in the hands of an agnostic. As his mother dies, his Dark Night of the Soul intensifies until called to help in the house of a famous Hollywood star.

An atheist, locked in a bitter divorce, Chris MacNeil is a woman who doesn’t have it all. Despite her successful career, she doesn’t have enough time to devote to her daughter, Regan. On the campus of Georgetown University to shoot a film, MacNeil’s path crosses Karras’ not by fate but by divine plan.

Enter God, Grand Architect of the Universe and Supreme Being Extraordinaire. Whether real or not, God remains one of fiction’s top rated characters, capable of crossing genres with ease, even appearing in literary works where (despite being at LEAST a 30th level magic user / cleric / druid under old-school AD&D rules) He doesn’t break the deal for some strange reason. God goes to grab a soda or something and fails to bubble Chris’s daughter Regan during a crucial boss fight and Regan is possessed by the Devil.

Now, as plots go, we can always demand, “Why God, why? Why did you fail to bubble your humblest servant?” To which the answer is, “Damien Karras needs saving.”

And that’s the plot of the book. Merrin is an old man. Regan is an innocent. Chris is an atheist. Damien’s soul is the true target, the true goal. He’s the protagonist.

As Damsel-In-Distress themes go, this one is clever. Sure, Regan and Chris need Merrin and Karras, but Karras needs the other three more than they need him. Theologically, Regan’s soul is pure–she will join the Limbo of the Infants should the Exorcist fail–and then find her way to heaven in due course. But Karras faces a greater risk, one which he overcomes as Extreme Unction is administered to him following his heroic absorption of the demonic entity into himself to save the little girl.

The myth is clear: The Enemy is older than we are individually, but collectively we possess a wisdom tradition and the fortitude necessary to overcome the darkness. Timeless.

 

4 thoughts on “‘The Exorcist’ — A Study in Modern Western Mysticism

  1. kristinsuzy

    So good, Victor. I almost wish I’d read your review before reading the book itself–I might’ve enjoyed it more. God as fiction’s favorite secondary character. *sigh* So good.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Warner H. M.

    Victor,
    I enjoyed your post, and I really liked how you mentioned Chris’s character. I thought Blatty’s portrayal of her was fantastic, and you’re right…she had a lot, yet she wasn’t fulfilled. Why are people like that? Sometimes I think, I’m pretty happy, why am I writing a book? Is having a published book going to make my life better? Probably will. Plus, my ideas about a Spy-Grandma is so earth shattering, the world needs it. I don’t have an ego problem….my pearl…okay, I’m just writing jibberish now. Great analysis buddy! Later.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Victor, this is the most beautiful book review I have ever read. Your analysis captured the heart of this novel so perfectly it should be included with every copy of the book sold from now on. I’m glad I decided to check one more blog before heading off to bed. Bravo.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. “But beyond the technical issues, at the heart of the story, lurks something deeper–a mythic pattern told with eloquence and awful beauty conveying the theme of Redemption via Sacrifice.”

    This was the theme and my diagnosis of the novel as well. Both by his own admission and my personal read, Blatty’s novel is about faith, sacrifice, and as you eloquently put it, “the consequence of reason.” It would be insulting to others (and probably myself) to say that “stringent education/devoted philosophical inquiry” are often faith-killers, but in my own case, it worked in opposite: I was a vehement disbeliever who became a believer through ruthless inquiry and testing. As they say, “that which cannot sustain criticism and question is not strong at all.”

    I loved this review man. We’ll have to talk about it at residency over a table and cold drinks.

    Liked by 1 person

Shriek into the Void...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s