Every event has a cause, every movement a starting point….

Thomas Harris’ Red Dragon occupies a special place in my heart and on my bookshelf. It’s a book about the vicious cycle of abuse, about the need for love and acceptance, about what happens when you take a child and turn it into a vessel for hate, diminution, and rejection.  In computer science there’s a term that gets used a lot: GIGO. It’s short for “Garbage in, garbage out” meaning that a program can only process the data you give it; feed a system crap and crap comes out the other end. That’s the story of Francis Dolarhyde and he is the Great Red Dragon before the Woman Clothed in the Sun.

Children emerge from the womb largely tabula rasa. Base traits of greed and selfishness have been observed in babies by psychologists and philosophers going as far back as Saint Augustine. Those are the qualities that we’re supposed to outgrow, to shed under the tutelage of our parents who scold and chide, “Now, you need to share….”

But what happens when a child isn’t raised right? What happens when a child is never permitted an ounce of dignity or self-respect? Enter Francis Dolarhyde, the vessel for the Great Red Dragon of Apocalypse. Abused and bullied by strangers, peers, and especially the people who are supposed to love him, Dolarhyde is the product of the cruelty inflicted on him by others. He takes his frustration out on animals first and discovers in their deaths a sort of power, a seed of self-actualization that has otherwise been denied him. In death, pain, and suffering, the weak, milquetoast Francis becomes the Red Dragon.

The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed in the Sun
The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed in the Sun by William Blake (there exists another variant.)

Francis is a hairlip with a cleft palate. He is put in an orphanage by his mother and later retrieved by his grandmother, only to punish the mother who didn’t want him in the first place. Older boys at the orphanage tell him that his name is “cunt face” and his malady goes unattended until he becomes a young man. When he is forced to live with his mother and her two wanted children, he is severely beaten by his half brother.

Francis’ murders serve a purpose and that purpose, as he sees it, is his becoming. “To become” is a verb filled with promise and potential. The ancient Egyptian word “kepher” means “to become” and is the root of the name of the deity Kephra, the scarab beetle who takes charge of the solar disk as it sinks below the horizon and who rolls the dung-ball of the sun up into the sky in the morning. Thus, the word is associated with beginnings and with death. It is a word long associated with deity (it is argued that the ancient name of God, Yahweh, means ‘I will become’) and it implies a previous state of nonexistence from which something emerges. Truly, it’s a word more suited to a miracle than it is day-to-day conversation.

It’s also interesting to note that when clothing looks good on someone, we say it “becomes them.” For Francis Dolarhyde, the Red Dragon is “becoming.” That is, he is accepted, he is good looking, he is handsome in the mirrored eyes of his dead witnesses. To Francis, his actions make perfect sense because they make him feel good about himself. Like the adage goes, “If this is wrong, I don’t want to be right.”

For Dolarhyde the transition from animals to people comes with his discovery of the painting by the mystic and poet William Blake. He is seized by a sexual sensation, the work speaks to him. It’s often a sure sign of mental instability when someone believes that a work of art (a song, a poem, a novel, a painting, a sculpture, etc.) somehow speaks to him specifically. (If you’ve ever had a friend with schizophrenia, you know what I’m talking about. A song comes on the radio and they insist it’s about their life and all you can do is smile and ask, “So, what did you have for breakfast?”)

While most people focus on Hannibal Lecter, who makes his first appearance in Red Dragon, or on Lecter’s initial nemesis, Will Graham, who foils Dolarhyde, the real foci of the novel are police procedure and abnormal psychology. Graham was unique for his day, but since this novel the nearly-psychic FBI profiler has become something of a stock character in his own right: Fox Mulder made this character popular, Frank Black made him god-like. (If you’re not familiar with Frank Black, get the first and second seasons of Millennium and skip the third.) The profiler allows the audience to enter the head of the killer, gives us insight into why the killer does what he does.

And while Harris lays out Dolarhyde’s motives via the backstory he provides, it is Graham’s initial observations which make the flashbacks possible. Graham’s profiling sketches Dolarhyde so that we don’t feel like the shift in POV away from the investigator to the killer is in any way forced. Compare the last episode of season one of True Detective, where we truly see Errol Childress for the first time and the connection is made for us. We’ve had no real insight into why he is the vessel for the Yellow King but when we see the scars on his face and back it falls into place.

For many, this scene broke the narrative. We were shuffled out of the protagonists’ POV and into the antagonist’s. The philosophy of the killer was better understood than his motive and the two are not the same: One is the abstract notion explaining what the killer believes he must accomplish, the other is what makes him a killer; one is how the killer sees his actions, the other is why he kills in the first place.

So Red Dragon had an impact on psycho-killer horror. While others may have done it better since, it’s still easier to get the balance of backstory to motivation wrong (case in point, The Sculptor.)

6 thoughts on “Every event has a cause, every movement a starting point….

  1. It’s amazing that you and I wandered down similar metaphysical paths regarding Francis Dolarhyde’s transformation ideology, his “I’m changing them” and the “I have become.” More, we also keyed in on the same thing: Kepher. That is the Egyptian spelling for Kether which is the “crown” on Kabbalah’s Tree of Life.

    In Red Dragon, Egyptology and Kabbalah, the choice “to become” is the ultimate goal. It is the manifestation of the idea, like the kernel of a book, and to climb the Tree of Life is to manifest that ideal, to give it form and to bring it to fruition.

    We see this very thing in Dolarhyde’s journey through Red Dragon, his quest “to become” the red dragon itself. Thus, I think the Red Dragon story is two-fold. Dolarhyde’s delirious desire to become one of the seven heads of the Red Dragon, the embodiment of all things culture looks away from, and law enforcement’s attempt to identify him and stop his crimes, and Graham’s desperate rejection of himself as one of the Red Dragon’s heads, capable of walking that maze of madness. There is little difference between the mind that would embrace evil and the mind that can unravel the evil enough to find the culprit.

    As Lecter said, “We’re just alike!”

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I have a lot of feels for Dolarhyde, and the fact that he obsesses over a William Blake work kind of makes me love him. And then his emotions toward Reba and the tiger scene are really beautiful. Harris creates fascinating characters here with Graham, Dolarhyde, and Lecter. They each possess layers and depth, and even though we only see Lecter briefly in this novel, he always seems to be lurking somehow with how he set events into motion. This book is clever, the characters are unique, and holy hell I just love the writing style so much.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Matt Andrew

    Great discussion on the meaning of “becoming.” I had no idea it had such a deeper meaning than than to simply change form.

    You also mentioned bullying, which is something I’m no stranger to. Ideally we are all responsible for out actions and mustn’t rationalize our poor/illegal decisions on how people treated us. But that’s the funny thing about bullying–if you terrorize a kid for some defect, speech impediment, or other fault, you never know what kind of monster you are helping to construct. Cunt Face became the Red Dragon thanks to a little help from his “friends”…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I wonder if there would have been any point in which Dolarhyde would have felt like he had finished becoming and was finally the Red Dragon in full. I would assume no, but his murders were fueling him as though he were in fact getting closer to his goal. So how would his murders have changed? He would certainly continue to kill, but what purpose would the murders serve? Preservation of his state?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. “The philosophy of the killer was better understood than his motive and the two are not the same: One is the abstract notion explaining what the killer believes he must accomplish, the other is what makes him a killer; one is how the killer sees his actions, the other is why he kills in the first place.”
    I found this very enlightening. How many times have we seen lazy backstory thrown in as a placeholder for a killer’s motive? If we were to ask Dolarhyde why he kills, I’m sure he wouldn’t have the slightest inclination to blame his upbringing or relate it to anything that happened to him pre-Blake at all.

    Liked by 1 person

Shriek into the Void...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s