Spider head, spider head / Use a flamethrower & still not dead….

What can I say about John Carpenter’s The Thing except that the movie features a truly compelling alien… and Wilford Brimley (who is kind of like a supernatural monster in that he’s a talking walrus-man of some sort.)

In the movie, after an encounter with some insane Norwegians hell-bent on killing what seems a hapless dog, a team of American scientists face a horror from beyond time and space. The Norwegians, having earlier discovered a crashed space ship under the ice, have unleashed a shape-shifting monster (the Thing) which the Americans promptly adopt (the monster having taken the form of the dog.) As the movie progresses, the alien shifts form to replace various members of the American team until only two men remain, doomed to freeze to death as their base camp burns.

Two things struck me as amazing about the film. First, the Thing. The alien has no true form. It’s a shape-shifter. It goes from being a dog to being a person to being a person but with a voracious torso-mouth to being a spider-legged-head . It’s also self-similar in that any portion of the being is the Thing itself, which always appeals to mathematicians. (At one point, a Petri dish full of the Thing in the form of blood reacts to having a hot loop of wire shoved into it.) This makes the true monster unseen, unknowable, like the true substance of a thing (if you’re into ancient Greek metaphysics.) This is perfect for an alien: No bipedal form, no head, no eyes, no legs. The Thing is truly alien.

Second, the end of the movie is brilliant. Whether despair is horrific or not has been a key concern of mine lately. But now I am convinced that a bleak, bitter end to a piece works for horror and works as horror. That is, despair is a form of horror.

The alien monster in The Thing also serves as a good example of a Lovecraftian monster while not truly a being of the Mythos. It exhibits all of the traits we expect in a Mythos entity:

  • Alien – Given.
  • Ancient – At least 100,000 years old.
  • Hyper-Intelligent – Hey, even I can’t fly a spaceship.
  • Amorphous – It can even be a liquid.
  • Inscrutable – Though intelligent and capable of speaking when in human form, the Thing’s goals remain elusive.
  • Tentacles – Tentacles galore!

The theme of isolation served the movie well. In the Antarctic, the heroes of the story are effectively cut off from help. They are forced to deal with the monster while growing increasingly paranoid that one of their own is actually the alien in disguise. This lets the tension build without interruption throughout the film.  In truth, the ending might seem a let-down to some, but it can really end no other way. What could possibly top that growing sense of dread better than an uncertain despair and the prospect of freezing to death?

The film spawned a prequel also titled The Thing. While I personally found the prequel to be less terrifying than the original, the fact that every detail from the disheveled Norwegian base camp is explained pleased me. (No, seriously. Watch the original and the prequel and notice the ax. Oh, yes. That’s the tell–the ax.)

5 thoughts on “Spider head, spider head / Use a flamethrower & still not dead….

  1. Nice, I had a feeling you would make at least one mention of Lovecraft.

    I, too, am satisfied with the ending, and don’t feel the need for the security blanket of “closure.” The end as depicted is the only true one–anything else would have been pandering. Despair is underrated.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The ending might have been the only thing I liked about this movie. I thought it was smart, and unlike in other genres, I don’t expect things to be tied into a neat little bow at the end of a horror story.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The shapeshifting definitely freaked me out. It played into the whole idea of the unknown, which is always a great factor to involve in horror. We don’t truly know what this thing looks like and just get these freaky metamorphosis versions throughout the movie. I agree the isolation is done well in the movie too, especially at the end where we know it is highly unlikely that these two survivors, even if neither one of them is possessed with the thing, are going to make it out of this freezing cold place alive.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. When I was about to rent the movie, I noticed that there was one made recently. Until that moment I hadn’t realized that there was a prequel. It’s on my to-watch list now, but part of me knows it won’t have the same impact as the original (but that’s typically the case). I’ll keep an eye out for the ax though!

    I like how you brought up isolation horror. That’s something that I’ve been obsessed with lately. It seems like an easy way to raise the stakes and amp up the tension. Granted, it’s not always possible but most of the horror novels I love (The Shining for one) have a strong sense of isolation.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Victor, I always enjoy your posts. You catch things that I don’t and spin them in a new way.

    I had a very different experience of the movie. It didn’t really draw me in and I wasn’t really that scared. I admit, the alien idea is super cool, especially how the things is one and nothing at the same time.

    What did you think of the prequel? I noticed it didn’t have nearly as high ratings. Do you think that’s because it was a revival of a “classic”?

    Liked by 1 person

Shriek into the Void...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s